Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sahare, Kamal Kishore
- Anterior Approach of Ultrasound Guided Sciatic Nerve Block for Knee and below Knee Surgeries:A Pilot Study
Abstract Views :307 |
PDF Views:107
Authors
Affiliations
1 Arihant Hospital, Dubey Colony, Mova, Raipur, IN
1 Arihant Hospital, Dubey Colony, Mova, Raipur, IN
Source
Central Journal of ISA, Vol 1, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 21-25Abstract
Background and Aims: Sciatic nerve block with femoral nerve block besides its advantages has been used to achieve complete anaesthesia for knee and below knee surgery. The anterior approach has been the most seldom used due to absence of reliable landmarks and technical difficulty. We evaluated the clinical application of the anterior approach to Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound guidance. Methods: This pilot study was conducted in 30 patients aged 18-59 yrs of ASA I-II who underwent knee and below knee surgery. With patient supine and knee externally rotated, sciatic nerve was approached under ultrasound guidance and 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine along with 10 ml2% lignocaine with adrenaline was injected. Then 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine&5 ml 2% lignocaine with adrenaline was injected at femoral nerve. Number of attempts, block execution time, onset of complete sensory and motor block, patient satisfaction was measured. Results: Surgical anaesthesia was achieved in 22 patients. 8 patients needed SAB wereas this was a pilot study no comparisons could be made and hence there was no p valueconsidered as failure of procedure. We observed themean number of attempts required to place the needle at site 3.50 ± 1.106; mean block execution time 9.66 ± 3.63 min; mean onset time of sensory block&motor block was 17.83 ± 7.552 min&24.97 ± 3.479 min respectively. 12 (40%) patients were satisfied with the technique used and reported it as excellent. Conclusion: Results of this study show promising outcome in terms of the number of attempts, block execution time, onset of sensory&motor block and patient satisfaction and indicate the need to conduct this study on a larger scale. We conclude that anterior approach is an excellent alternative approach to other approaches for sciatic nerve block especially in patients with multiple injuries.Keywords
Anterior Approach, Pilot Study, Sciatic Nerve Anatomy, Various Approaches for Block.References
- Labat G. Its technique and clinical applications, Regional Anaesthesia, 2nd edition. Philadelphia, Saunders Publishers 1924; 45–55
- Seymor DG, Prigle R. Post-operative complications in the elderly surgical population. Gerontology 1983; 29:262–70.
- Tantry TP, Kadam D, Shetty P, Bhandary S. Combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for lower limb anaesthesia in anticoagulated patients with severe cardiac valvular lesions. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010; 54(3):235–38.
- Beck GP. Anterior approach to sciatic nerve block. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 222–4.
- Fuzier R, Fuzier V, Albert N, Barbero C, Villaceque E, Samii K et al. The sciatic nerve block in emergency settings: A comparison between a new anterior and the classic lateral approaches. Med SciMonit 2004; 10(10):563–7.
- Dalens B, Tanguy A, Vanneuville G. Sciatic Nerve Blocks in Children: Comparison of the Posterior, Anterior, and Lateral Approaches in 180 Pediatric Patients. Anesthesia Analgesia 1990; 70:131–7.
- Ericksen ML, Swenson JD, Pace NL. The anatomic relationship of the sciatic nerve to the lesser trochanter: Implications for anterior sciatic nerve block. Anesthesia Analgesia 2002; 95:1071–4.
- Chan V, Nova H, Abbas S, McCartney CJ, Perlas A, Xu DQ. Ultrasound Examination and Localization of the Sciatic Nerve: A Volunteer Study. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:309–14.
- Bromage PR. (1978): Description of the Bromage score. Quoted from Owen, M.D. (1998). 0.25% Ropivacaine is similar to 0.25% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient control epidural infusion. Anesthesia Analgesia; 1998.
- Amin Wafik A, Abou SMO, Saeed Mervat F, Mohammad Sohair F, AbdelHaleem TM, Shabaan EA. Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block: Comparative Study between the Parasacral, Lateral and Anterior Approaches for Lower Limb Surgery. Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology 2010; 20(5):695–702.
- Ota J, Sakura S, Hara K, Saito Y. Ultrasound-Guided Anterior Approach to Sciatic Nerve Block: A Comparison with the Posterior Approach. Anesthesia Analgesia 2009; 108:660–5.
- Alsatli RA. Comparison of ultrasound-guided anterior versus transgluteal sciatic nerve blockade for knee surgery. Anesthesia Essays and Research 2012 Jan-June; 6(1):29–33.
- Dolan J. Ultrasound-guided anterior sciatic nerve block in the proximal thigh: an in-plane approach improving the needle view and respecting fascial planes. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013 Feb; 110(2):319–20
- Chelly JE, Delaunay L. A New Anterior Approach to the Sciatic Nerve Block. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1655–60.
- Van Elstraete AC, Poey C, Lebrun T, Pastureau F. New Landmarks for the Anterior Approach to the Sciatic Nerve Block: Imaging and Clinical Study. Anesthesia Analgesia 2002; 95:214–8.
- The Effect of Low-Flow and High-Flow Sevoflurane Anaesthesia on Renal and Liver Function:A Comparative Study
Abstract Views :248 |
PDF Views:95
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, IN
2 Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, IN
1 Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, IN
2 Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, IN
Source
Central Journal of ISA, Vol 1, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 26-30Abstract
Background and Aims: Sevoflurane degradation products can affect liver and renal functions. The study was undertaken to assess the safety of low- flow sevoflurane anaesthesia and high- flow sevoflurane anaesthesia by comparing their effects on renal and liver functions. Material and Methods: The study was conducted in 100 adult patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I or II, who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were selected randomly into two groups to receive either low-flow Sevoflurane (n=50) or high-flow Sevoflurane (n=50) anaesthesia. In all these patients, preoperative renal function tests (RFT)&liver function tests (LFT) were done. RFT included blood urea, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, urinary protein&LFT included serum bilirubin, SGOT, SGPT, ALP. The patients were induced by intravenous thiopentone [4-7 mg/kg] and succinylcholine [1-2 mg/kg] was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. Trachea was intubated with appropriate size cuffed endotracheal tube. Anaesthesia was maintained with either highflow Sevoflurane with fresh gas flow of 4.5- 7 Liters/minute or low-flow Sevoflurane with fresh gas flow of 1- 3 L/min. Blood samples were collected before operation and at 0 hour, 06 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr&72 hr postoperatively to measure Blood urea, Serum creatinine, Creatinine Clearance (CL), serum bilirubin, Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminases (SGOT), Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminases (SGPT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Urine samples were collected at 24 hrs preoperatively&every 24 hrs for up to 72 hrs postoperatively to measure urine protein. Results: This study shows alterations in renal&hepatic functions in low-flow sevoflurane anaesthesia as well as high-flow sevoflurane anaesthesia. However, the alterations in renal&hepatic functions were within upper normal limit in both groups as assessed using conventional measures of hepatic&renal functions. Conclusion: We conclude that there were no statistically significant differences in the hepato-renal function by the effect of low flow and high flow sevoflurane anaesthesia and both seem to be equally safe.Keywords
High-Flow, Kidney Function, Low-Flow, Liver Function, Sevoflurane.References
- Smith I, Nathanson M, White PF. Sevoflurane- A long- awaited volatile anesthetic. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:435–45.
- Evers AS, Crowdery CM, Basler JR. General Anaesthetic. In: Goodman LS, Brunton LL, Gilman A, Chabner B, Knollmann BC editors. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2011; 546.
- Behne M, Wilke HJ, Harder S. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane. Adis 1999; 36:13–26.
- Bito H, Ikeda K. Renal and hepatic function in surgical patients after low–flow Sevoflurane or Isoflurane Anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg 1996; 82:173–6.
- Hamimy W, Ashour E, Afif M. Effects of Regional Epidural Ropivacaine Anaesthesia on α-Glutathione-S-Transferase: Comparison with Low Flow Sevoflurane and Total Intravenous Propofol Anaesthesia. Journal of Biological Sciences 2004; 4(3):398–404.
- Morio M, Fuji K, Satoh N, Imai M, Kawakami U, Mizuno T et al. Reaction of sevoflurane and its degradation products with sodalime: Toxicity of the by products. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:1155.
- Kharash ED , Frink EJ Jr, Zager R, Bowdle TA, Artru A, Nogami WM. Assessment of low-flow Sevoflurane & Isoflurane effects on renal function using sensitive markers of tubular toxicity. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:1238–53.
- Eger El, Koblin DD, Bowland T, Ionescu P, Laster MJ, Fang Z et al. Nephrotoxicity of Sevoflurane versus Desflurane anesthesia in volunteers. Anaesth Analg 1997; 84:160–8.
- Sahin SH, Cinar SO, Paksoy I, Sut N, Oba S. Comparison between low flow Sevoflurane anaesthesia & total intravenous anaesthesia during intermediate-duration surgery: Effects on renal & hepatic toxicity. Hippokratia 2011 Jan-Mar; 15(1):69–74.
- Kim JW, Kim JD, Yu SB, Ryu SJ. Comparison of hepatic & renal function between Inhalation anaesthesia with Sevoflurane and Remifentanil and Total Intravenous anaesthesia with Propofol and Remifentanil for thyroidectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013; 64(2):112–6.
- Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K. Liver and renal function after repeated Sevoflurane or Isoflurane anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45:789–93.
- Kharasch ED, Frink EJ, Artru A, Michalowski P, Rooke GA, Nogami W. Long duration low-flow Sevoflurane and Isoflurane effects on post-operative renal and hepatic function. Anaesth Analg 2001; 93:1511–20.
- Obata R, Bito H, Ohmura M, Moriwaki G, Ikeuchi Y, Katoh T et al. The effects of prolonged low-flow Sevoflurane anaesthesia on renal and hepatic function. Anaesth Analg 2000; 91:1262–8.
- Ebert TJ, Arain SR. Renal responses to low-flow Desflurane, Sevoflurane and Propofol in patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:1401–6.
- Lin IH, Fan SZ, Chen HM, Lee JJ, Cheng SJ, Chang HH et al. Changes in biomarkers of hepatic & renal function after prolonged general anaesthesia for oral cancer surgery: A cohort comparison between desflurane & Sevoflurane. Journal of Dental Sciences 2013; 8:385–91.
- Groudine SB, Fragen RJ, Kharasch ED, Eisenman TS, Frink EJ, McConnel S. Comparison of renal function following anaesthesia with lowflow Sevoflurane and Isoflurane. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11:201–7.
- Hanaki C, Fujii K, Morio M, Tashima T. Decomposition of sevoflurane by sodalime. Hiroshima J Med Sci 1987; 36:61.
- Frink EJ Jr, Malan TP, Morgan SE, Brown EA, Malcomson M, Gandolfi AJ et al. Quantification of the degradation products of sevoflurane in two CO2 absorbents during low-flow anesthesia in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:1064.